The Centrality of Gender, Sexuality, Race, Sociability and...

In Slumming by Chad Heap the author describes the true reality of slumming, and how it was more wide spread than what it appear just in the surface. Heap defines slumming, as he concentrate on cities like Chicago and New York, that were provide with entertainment. This entertainment would come from immigrants, blacks, gays and bohemians during a period of large scale immigration in this cities. The author explains in detail the culture of slumming, as well as how it helps to produce the sex/gender/racial system. Heap also argues how the different participants in slumming affect one another. The impact between the different interactions among different races, classes and gender was as well discussed in detail by the author. Finally Heap†¦show more content†¦Thanks to slumming the middle class was provided with a new way to define its own social and moral superiority. It also created reformers that were against slumming, but this produced more amusement as it created more seek ers. â€Å"the presence of reformers—especially female reformers—on the streets and in the tenements and dives of these districts paradoxically suggested that such spaces were safe for popular congregation, and reformers’ activities in the cities’ slums and red-light districts were often remarkably similar to those of their pleasure-seeking compatriots † (18). As more people were attracted to slumming it created a mix of social classes that broke the social bounties and chains that keep society in a hierarchy. Heap argues that slumming promoted social mixing and change the racial and sexual system. Many opportunities for slum residents as whites’ interest more in slumming culture grow. Some slums stated to offer tours of the slums to attract more customers. Slumming gave the opportunities to cross over class lines as well as ethic boundaries; but more importantly it gave the opportunity to explore ones sexual identity. The slums were a place for sexual exploration in where people were not judge for trying to discover ones sexuality. Sexual norms were different in the slum, for example men who were consider to be straight could have a sexual relationship with â€Å"fairies† in the slums. Fairies were

“Death of a Salesman” by Arthur Miller Free Essays

A play in which the title is significant but not obviously so is â€Å"Death of a Salesman† by Arthur Miller. In â€Å"Death of a Salesman† Miller explores the capitalism of 1940s America and how the American Dream does not benefit everyone in the business world. Willy Loman, the main character in the play, became a salesman after the death of another elderly salesman who could make money without leaving his hotel room. We will write a custom essay sample on â€Å"Death of a Salesman† by Arthur Miller or any similar topic only for you Order Now It was this salesman and how well liked he was that inspired Willy to become a salesman as he wanted to be well liked as Dave Singleman. Willy mentions on multiple occasions how well liked he was and that at his own funeral he wanted many people to be present as they had been at Dave Singleman’s funeral â€Å"When he died, hundreds of salesmen and buyers were at his funeral. † Like Dave Singleman Willy wanted people to come from all over the country to mourn him this sympathy towards him as this is a highly unlikely situation and he therefore is setting himself and his family into a deluded scene that will never be witnessed. Similar essay: Realism and Expressionism in Death of a Salesman Willy also wants to die the honourable death, which he now associates with being a salesman as he idolises Dave Singleman â€Å"He died the death of a salesman, in his green velvet slippers†¦ † However at the conclusion of the play it is clear that Willy Loman did not die the honourable death he so desired as no one from the business world arrived at his funeral only his wife, two sons, Charley and Bernard were present which also demonstrates how deluded Willy was in the life he led as he honestly believed his funeral would be of a similar scale to Dave Singleman’s. This evokes sympathy towards Willy as he did not die his ideal death of a salesman and seems to live by measuring how successful people are by the size of their funeral and therefore his own funeral reflects truly how unsuccessful his career as a salesman was. In â€Å"Death of a Salesman† Willy suffers a metaphorical death, the death of his dream of financial success. By the plays conclusion Willy is jobless and broke. Willy has a conversation with his brother Ben, who has been dead for some time, and concludes the best future for his family, especially Biff whom Willy is desperate to become successful, would be for him to kill himself as the insurance company would pay out $20, 000, enough to make Biff successful in Willy’s mind, â€Å"you end up worth more dead than alive. The irony of Willy killing himself is that he is killing himself to give Biff money in order for him to become a successful business man however the insurance company will not make a payout for suicide and Biff has no intention of following in his father’s footsteps. This evokes sympathy for Willy as he is trying to do the best for his family however he still cannot provide for them even through his death. During the play â€Å"Death of a Salesman† the title is significant as there is a physical death of a salesman in the respect that Willy dies and he is a salesman. Through killing himself Willy hopes to provide the financial support, which he has been failing to gain for many years, for his family that is required. The death of Willy is not honourable as he desires and is sorry ending to his unsuccessful life in business. In conclusion the title of the play is significant as it in further understanding of the events, which occur in the play. Miller uses the title to convey both a physical and metaphorical death and in order for the reader to understand the ending to their full capability. How to cite â€Å"Death of a Salesman† by Arthur Miller, Essay examples

The General Prologue Essay Paper Example For Students

The General Prologue Essay Paper By a close examination of two or three of the portraits in the Gen Prologue,  discuss the ways in which Chaucer considered corruption to be active among  those with religious responsibilities  It is clear from studying the General Prologue that Chaucer considered corruption to be active among those with religious responsibilities. To prove this I will examine the Monk and the Friar. Monks were part of a religious community and were vowed to poverty, chastity and obedience. But straight away from studying his portrait it is clear that he does not strictly follow these requirements. He is said to loved venerie and Ful many a deyntee hors hadde he in stable. It was forbidden for monks to have many horses this shows that not only does he not care for poverty but he also clearly has no regard for obedience. The bells on his horse were said to be so loud men mighte his bridel here ginglen in a whistlinge wind als cleere and eek as loude as dooth the chapel belle. This shows that for him the bells of his horse were louder and therefore more important than the bells of the church. The Monk was an example of many contemporaries of Chaucers who had no regard for the old values of the world such as religious dedication but were more concerned with the ideas of the new world, such as pleasure-seeking, This ilke Monk leet olde thinges pace, and heeld after the newe world the space.  The Monks love of hunting clearly interferes with his work and he is hardly a dedicated worshipper or indeed a supporter of religion or his job. He questions the point in keeping clergy confined to meaningless tasks, How shal the world be served? He is tempted by the thrills of hunting and fine clothes, Hunting for the hare was al his lust, for no cost wolde he spare. This shows that he put hunting above anything else. It is also noted that He hadde of gold ywroght a ful curious pin. He clearly took pleasure in fine clothes. The Monk is said to enjoy swan the most out of all the roasts. This is a sign of pure indulgence as the swan was expensive and hard to prepare. Although he is clearly corrupt, Chaucer does show his respect for him. He describes him as nat pale as a forpined goost. Throughout the General Prologue Chaucer shows respect for those who have some life in their skin. It shows that he is an active and passionate man. But this does not hide his corruption; no other Monk was as involved in dalliance as he was.  The Friar is equally corrupt if not more. Friars differed from Monks as they were licensed to beg and leave their cloister. Chaucer uses very ironic language throughout the portrait of the Friar. He talks of the way the Friar would marry off young poor girls at his owene cost. On closer examination this is probably to avoid scandal as he most probably seduced these girls. The first sign of irony comes when Chaucer speaks of the Friar as a noble post. Irony again is used when Chaucer describes his familiarity with worthy women. These women are definitely not worthy and are most likely victims of the Friars seduction. The Friar was licensed to hear confession but he uses this to his own advantage by offering terms of absolution for a price. This is extremely corrupt and shows that he lacks basic morals. The Friar believes that paying for absolution is more valuable than weeping or crying, For unto a povre ordre for to yive is signe that a man is wel yshrive.  Chaucer describes the Friar as having a nekke whit as the flour-de-lys. This is unfavourable as Chaucer describes honourable and healthy pilgrims to be tanned such as the Shipman. .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4 , .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4 .postImageUrl , .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4 , .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4:hover , .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4:visited , .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4:active { border:0!important; } .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4:active , .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4 .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u1ecd256f507e947aecdecdcf01f085a4:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: A Christmas Carol Argumentative EssayChaucer depicts the Friar as an indulgent man who isnt a charitable Christian at all. This is backed up by, he knew the taverns wel in every toun and everich hostiler and tappestere bet than a lazar or a beggestere. Knowing taverns and barmaids better than leppars or beggars shows that he has no real concern for the plight of the less worthy but cares only for indulgence. Chaucer again uses irony, describing the Friar as a worthy man. The Friar believes that he shouldnt bother spending time with leppars but only with people for his own profit. This again shows extreme lack of charity. More scathing irony is used as Chaucer informs us th at if a chance of profit should arise the Friar would become courteous, this is confirmed by the way he is described by Chaucer, there was no man nowher so verteous. Another example of the Friars corruptness is the way he uses his religious position to beg more effectively. Chaucer describes an occasion where a widow with hardly any money to speak of was so moved by his words that she donated money. The Friar again shows a lack of care for anyone but himself, taking money from a woman with practically none shows true corruption. The Friar, like the Monk was a lover of fine clothes and is written to wear a cape made of very expensive fabric, Of double worstede was his semicope.